|
David A. Bryant will be speaking about
Medicare at the Annual AAJ convention in July 2010.
David is a chair to the ERISA, Health and Disability
Insurance Litigation Group. For more information,
click
here.
POsted 7/12/2010
On June 24, 2010, David A. Bryant spoke
at the ACI's 13th National advance Forum on Litigating
Disability Insurance claims.
POsted 6/24/2010
On May 28, 2010,
Mark DeBofsky spoke at the 10th
Patient/Caregiver Symposium, entitled "The Rush
Parkinson's Disease Symposium held in Chicago from
12p.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the O'Hare Hyatt Regency.
POsted 5/28/2010
On May 19-21, 2010,
Mark DeBofsky will be co-chairing the
ERISA Basics conference to be held in Chicago, and will
be speaking about the impact of HIPAA and COBRA on
health benefits on May 21, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.
POsted 5/20/2010
On Friday May 14, 2010, Frederick J. Daley
and Heather Freeman spoke at the
semi-annual NOSSCR conference in a session titled,
"Addressing Vocational Testimony at Step Five."
McCormick v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-227 (N.D. Ind. May 11, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. McCormick was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with the assistance of Suzanne Blaz.
Smith v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-101 (N.D. Ind. May 6, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Smith was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Sandra Dye.
Hamilton
v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-11553 (E.D. Mich. May 6, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand for calculation of
benefits; an outright reversal and award of benefits.
Ms. Hamilton was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with the assistance of Suzanne Blaz.
Huber v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-1292 (C.D. Ill. May 3, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Huber was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with the assistance of Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 5/17/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
May 3, 2010:
Do complaints of debilitating pain result in disability?
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 5/10/2010
On April 27, 2010,
Mark DeBofsky and Frederick J.
Daley spoke on a panel called,
“You’ve Won!
Now What??”
Payment Processing and offsets, from A to Z at
the 2010 Chicago NADR conference.
On April 24, 2010, Gregory Benker
presented, "How to Spot an ERISA Plan (and avoid it) &
the Top 10 Tips for Applying for Disability Benefits" at
Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine.
On April 20, 2010,
Mark DeBofsky
spoke at the BNA Webinar
about, "Discretionary Clauses Under Fire: The Future of
Discretionary Clauses in Health, Disability, and Life
Insurance Plans."
POsted 4/27/2010
Mabie v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-281 (N.D. Ind. April 20, 2010).
The Government agreed to voluntary remand after the case
had been briefed by
Frederick J. Daley
with the assistance of Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 4/20/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
April 19, 2010:
Courts face challenges with ERISA, limitations period.
Click on the link to read the article.
McKinnie v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-83 (N.D. Ind. April 16, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand for an award of
benefits.
Mr. McKinnie was represented by Heather Freeman
and Frederick J. Daley.
Richards v. Astrue,
No. 09-2595 (7th Cir. April 13, 2010).
The Seventh Circuit issued a remand.
Ms. Richards was represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom
and Frederick J. Daley.
POsted 4/19/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
April 5, 2010:
How the courts address 'legal' disabilities.
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 4/5/2010
Shepherd v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-2156 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 31, 2010).
The Government agreed to voluntary
remand after the case had been briefed by
Frederick J. Daley with
the help of Suzanne Blaz and Stephanie Tomal.
Grooms v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-14189 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Grooms was represented by Frederick J. Daley.
Brady v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-4216 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 16, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Brady was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie E. Goldbloom.
POsted 4/1/2010
On March 18, 2010, Frederick J. Daley, Marcie
Goldbloom
and Suzanne Blaz spoke at the CBA Social Security Law
Committee about the representation of claimants at the
Federal District Court level.
Brady v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-4216 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 16, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Brady was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie E. Goldbloom.
Mark DeBofsky was recently quoted by Lawrence Kelley
in his article, "The
“Medical Occupation” Definition of Disability: Don’t
Believe the Hype.
POsted 3/18/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
March 15, 2010:
Court looks at deficiencies in determining disability.
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 3/15/2010
Page v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-210 (E.D. Ken. Mar. 8, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Page was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie E. Goldbloom.
POsted 3/8/2010
Smith v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-41 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 2, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Smith was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from
Kimberly Jones.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
March 1, 2010:
How CIGNA handles or mishandles disability claims.
Click on the link to read the article.
Halbrook v. Astrue,
No. 07-cv-150 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 18, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Halbrook was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Evans v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-132 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 18, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Evans was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 3/2/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
February 16, 2010:
Who gets the last word in an ERISA claim appeal?
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 2/16/2010
Conley v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2234 (C.D. Ill. Feb. 5, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Conley was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 2/11/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
February 1, 2010:
A split in the circuits exists for ERISA benefit
disputes.
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 2/1/2010
The
Government agreed to voluntary remands in the following
cases in January of 2010:
Grigsby v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-2139 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2010)
and
Molsen v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-3891 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 2010).
These clients were represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from
Gregory Benker and Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
January 18, 2010:
Courts deal with issue of ERISA attorney fees.
Click on the link to read the article.
An article by Violet Borowski was
featured in the ABA Employee Benefits Committee's winter
2009 Newsletter:
The Supreme Court’s Decision in Metropolitan Life v.
Glenn: Clarity or Confusion?
Fuller v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-3292 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 15, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Fuller was represented by Frederick J. Daley.
Buckner v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-2550 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 2010).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Buckner was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from
Kimberly Jones.
POsted 1/25/2010
Elmore v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2221 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 15, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Elmore was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Fields v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-259 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 30, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Fields was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
January 4, 2010:
ERISA: A Frankenstein made up of different laws.
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 1/4/2010
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
December 21, 2009:
Applying deferential standard of review in evaluating
claims.
Click on the link to read the article. posted
POsted 12/22/2009
The
Government agreed to voluntary remands in the following
cases in August through October after
the case had been briefed by Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant:
Bishop v. Astrue,
Case No.: (E.D. Cal.),
Brown v. Astrue,
Case No.: 09-cv-174 (W.D. Wisc.),
Cunningham v. Astrue, Case No.: 08-cv-568
(N.D. Ind.), Demchak v. Astrue,
Case No.: 08-cv-475 (N.D. Ind.),
Hanske v. Astrue, Case No.: 09-cv-48 (N.D.
Ind.), Hawks v. Astrue, Case
No.: 09-cv-70 (N.D. Ind.), Johnson v. Astrue,
Case No.: 09-cv-1402 (N.D. Ga.),
Keeling v. Astrue, Case No.: 09-cv-15
(N.D. Ind.), Little
v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-990 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7,
2009),
McCormick v. Astrue, Case No.: 09-cv-147
(E.D. Wisc.), Nagel v. Astrue,
Case No.: 08-cv-6035 (N.D. Ill.), Newsom v.
Astrue, Case No.: 09-cv- 10508 (E.D.
Mich.), Roman v. Astrue, Case
No.: 08-cv-2019 (M.D. Fl.)
These clients were represented by Frederick J.
Daley, Jr. with assistance from Marcie
Goldbloom, Kimberly Jones, Gregory Benker and
Suzanne Blaz.
Leisure v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2222 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Leisure was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 12/14/2009
McConkey v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2249 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 1, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
McConkey was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
November 30, 2009:
Get to the truth on the matter.
Click on the link to read the article.
POsted 12/3/2009
Mark DeBofsky spoke at the 19th Annual
National Institute ERISA Litigation conference for the
plaintiff's side on long-term disability claims.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
November 16, 2009:
Court revisits difficult issue of 'total disability'.
Click on the link to read the article.
Lauer v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-831 (E.D. Wisc. Nov. 10, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Lauer was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Kimberly Jones
On November 10, 2009,
Equip for
Equality recognized Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant
as a pro bono leader.
POsted 11/17/2009
Mark DeBofsky spoke at the ABA Section
of Labor & Employment Law 3rd Annual CLE conference in
Washington, D.C., which was held November 4 to 7, 2009.
Mark DeBofsky spoke at a workshop
entitled, "In the Lion's den: Surviving
Cross-Examination" at the American Academy of
Psychiatry and the Law's Annual Meeting held in
Baltimore, MD from October 29 to November 1, 2009.
Chandler v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2204 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 9, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Chandler was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from
Suzanne Blaz.
Watson v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2173 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 5, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Watson was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 11/5/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
November 2, 2009:
Battle over standard of review likely to continue.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 11/2/2009
Hughes v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2211 (C.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Hughes was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
assisted by Suzanne Blaz.
posted
Travis v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-77 (W.D. Wisc. Oct. 22, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Travis was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie Goldbloom, assisted by Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 10/28/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
October 19, 2009:
When a literal reading can be overridden.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 10/22/2009
On October 16, 2009,
Mark DeBofsky spoke about "Disability
Issues in patients and clients with multiple sclerosis"
at the 2009 Rush University Medical Center
Neurorehabilitation Symposium in Chicago, Illinois.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
October 5, 2009:
9th Circuit ruling provides greater protection of
benefits.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 10/16/2009
On September 24, 2009, Mark DeBofsky
will be speaking at the State Bar of Georgia CLE
conference on "Employment Law for the General
Practitioner and the Pros" about Short-Tem, Long-term
and Social Security Disability benefits. For
information,
click
here.
POsted 10/14/2009
Mark DeBofsky will be part of a panel
of speakers talking about, "Disability and Mental
Illness - What it Means for You, Your Practice and Your
Clients" at the DRI Annual Meeting on Friday, October 8,
2009, at 1:30 p.m., which is being held in Chicago at
the Sheraton Chicago Hotel & Towers. For more
information,
click here.
POsted 10/14/2009
Terry v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-330 (E.D. Wisc. Sept. 30, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Terry was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie Goldbloom.
On September 29, 2009, in
Zanon v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-15337 (E.D. Mich.) and
McNelis v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-12529 (E.D. Mich.),
the District Court issued remands.
They were both represented by Frederick J. Daley.
Sucharski v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-284 (E.D. Wisc. Sept. 25, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Suzharski was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Heather Freeman.
POsted 9/30/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
September 21, 2009:
Clarity needed on contractual periods of limitation.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Reich v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-5810 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 15, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Reich was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie Goldbloom.
POsted 9/21/2009
Thompson v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-234 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 1, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Thompson was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Kimberly Jones.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
August 31, 2009:
Ruling Clarifies Contractual Limitations Periods.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Plesha v. Astrue,
No. 07-cv-6602 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 31, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Plesha was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Taylor
v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-2178
(C.D. Ill. Aug. 24, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Taylor was represented by Frederick J. Daley
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Mattison v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-60 (E.D. Wisc. Aug. 21, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Mattison was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Kimberly Jones.
POsted 9/1/2009
Boruff v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-14585 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Boruff was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie Goldbloom.
Ellwanger v. Astrue,
No. 09-cv-80 (W.D. Wisc. Aug. 14, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Ellwanger was represented by Frederick J. Daley
and Marcie Goldbloom.
POsted 8/18/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
August 3, 2009:
Payment Delays Merely Encourage Denials.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 8/7/2009
Anderson v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2108 (C.D. Ill. July 29, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Anderson was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Renna v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-682 (W.D. Wisc. July 16, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Renna was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Woods v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-348 (E.D. Ken. July 15, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Mr. Woods was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from
Kate Hoppe.
The
Government agreed to voluntary remands in the following
cases in July after the case had been briefed by
Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant:
Jeroy v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-13753 (E.D. Mich. July 9, 2009);
Zanon v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-15337 (E.D. Mich. July 13, 2009);
Reffett v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2257 (C.D. Ill. July 21, 2009);
Deisch v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-6557 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 2009);
and Garcia v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-6300 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 2009).
These clients were represented by Frederick J.
Daley, Jr. with assistance from Kate Hoppe,
Kim Jones, and Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 7/30/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
July 6, 2009:
Claims require an 'independent decision,' not a 'review'.
Click on the
link to read the article. posted 7/7/2009
POsted 7/7/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
June 29, 2009:
Efficiency, expediency need to give way to fairness.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 6/29/2009
Buljina v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-1904 (DC D. June 22, 2009).
The Government agreed to a voluntary remand after the
case had been briefed by Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant.
Mr. Buljina was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 6/22/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
June 15, 2009:
Ruling provides thoughtful primer on discovery.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Moreau v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-205 (N.D. Ind. June 11, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Moreau was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Bringe v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-1025 (E.D. Wisc. June 10, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Bringe was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 6/16/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
June 1, 2009:
Claim decisions must be reasonable and accurate.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 6/2/2009
Washington v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-990 (E.D. Mich. May 20, 2009).
The Government agreed to a voluntary remand after the
case had been briefed by Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant.
Ms. Washington was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from
Kate Hoppe.
Heflick v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-996 (E.D. Wisc. May 20, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Heflick was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 5/20/2009
Frederick J. Daley and Heather Freeman
gave presentations at the NOSSCR conference held in
Washington, D.C. from May 13 to 16, 2009. For more
info,
click
here.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
May 18, 2009:
Ruling affirms Glenn's impact on standard of review.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Davis v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-2091 (C.D. Ill. May 12, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand.
Ms. Davis was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
POsted 5/18/2009
Day v. Astrue,
No. 08-3031 (7th Cir. April 28, 2009).
The Seventh Circuit issued a remand.
Mr. Day was represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Wolvin v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-476 (E.D.Wisc. April 28, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case.
Mr. Wolvin was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
May 4, 2009:
Settlement did not justify vacatur: U.S. court.
Click on the
link to read the article.
POsted 5/5/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
April 20, 2009:
De novo review is not a rubber stamp.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Hisel v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-244 (E.D. Ky. April 23, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case.
Mr. Hisel was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from
Kate Hoppe
Kromer v. Astrue,
No. 08-cv-5181 (D.Min. April 21, 2009).
The Government agreed to a voluntary remand after the
case had been briefed by Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant.
Ms. Kromer was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from
Kim Jones.
POsted 4/24/2009
Travis v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-1774 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 31,
2009).
The District Court issued an outright reversal in
this case because
the ALJ did not properly consider the medical
evidence in the record, as well as three treating
physicians documenting the plaintiff’s disabling mental
impairments that exist despite any drug or alcohol
abuse. Mr. Travis was represented by
Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with assistance from
Kate Hoppe.
Jenkins v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-2193 (C.D. Ill. Mar.
26, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this casebecause the ALJ's RFC determination lacked a
medical opinion upon which to rely, relying on State
agency opinions he expressly rejected and by failing to
adequately explain and trace a path from the evidence to
his RFC findings. Ms. Jenkins was
represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom with
assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Ingram v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-2157 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 25,
2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case.
Ms. Ingram was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
April 6, 2009:
Discretionary clauses under heavy fire.
Click on the
link to read the article.
posted 4/10/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
March 23, 2009:
Ruling shows courts must take more responsibility.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Richardson v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-142 (S.D. Ill. Mar.
23, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because
the ALJ failed to discuss or weigh the findings
of therapist Miller or his functional assessment report,
the Court found the ALJ’s credibility determination
“troubling,” failing to make a proper determination and
consider all the factors as required by SSR 96-7p and
the ALJ’s hypotheticals and RFC finding failed to
adequately reflect the evidence supporting the findings
of moderate limitations in the areas of concentration,
persistence and pace and social functioning. Ms.
Richardson was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
posted 3/24/2009
Mark DeBofsky was nominated as a finalist for
LexisNexis' Insurance Law Center
Policyholder Attorney of the Year award. Mark
was the only attorney from Chicago nominated.
Mark DeBofsky was one of the presenters talking
about, "Mediation Skills and Strategies" at the 12th
Annual Labor & Employment Law Update held in the
USB Tower in Chicago, Illinois, on March 20, 2009 and at
the Hilton Garden Inn in Champaign, Illinois on March
25, 2009.
Davis v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-133 (N.D. Ind. Mar.
12, 2009).
The government agreed to a voluntary remand after
the case had been briefed by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant.
Ms. Davis was represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
posted 3/20/2009
Leger
v. Tribune Company Long Term Disability Benefit Plan,
2009 U.S.App.LEXIS 5108 (7th Cir. March 9, 2009).
The Seventh Circuit remanded this case for further
proceedings. Plaintiff was represented
by
Mark DeBofsky.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
March 16, 2009:
Ruling exposes defects in insurer's determination.
Click on the
link to read the article.
posted 3/16/2009
McKinney v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-309 (E.D. Ken.
Mar. 11, 2009).
The government declined to brief the case, but
instead agreed to a voluntary remand. This
occurred after the case had been briefed for district
court by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant. Ms. McKinney
was represented by Frederick J. Daley with
assistance from
Kate Hoppe.
Guerrero v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-2246 (D. Hi.
Mar. 10, 2009).
The District Court adopted the MJ's Report &
Recommendation and issued a remand in this case.
Ms. Guerrero was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from
Kimberly Jones.
Minyard v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-2023 (N.D. Ga.
Mar. 10, 2009).
The government declined to brief the case, but
instead agreed to a voluntary remand. This
occurred after the case had been briefed for district
court by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant. Ms. Minyard
was represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom with
assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Anderson v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-613 (N.D. Ill. Mar.
10, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ failed to explore Mr. Anderson's reasons
for not pursuing certain treatment, as required by SSR
96-7p, preferring to make inappropriate inferences,
wrongly found that Plaintiff's ability to read and use a
computer undermined his medication side-effects, and
improperly rejected the credibility of Mr. Anderson's
wife. Additionally, the hypotheticals failed to
account for some o the ALJ's own RFC findings as well as
Mr. Anderson's pain and medication side-effects.
Mr. Anderson was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from
Kimberly Jones.
Huber v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-2246 (C.D. Ill.
Mar. 3, 2009).
The District Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's
Report & Recommendation and issued a remand in this
case. Ms. Huber was represented by Frederick J.
Daley, Jr. with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
March 2, 2009:
Consider this before wrongfully denying a claim.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Winston v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-126 (N.D. Ind.
Feb. 26, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ improperly dismissed the treating
physician opinion as inconsistent when his opinion was
consistent with someone with a bipolar condition, who
had both good and bad days, resulting in an incomplete
RFC and hypotheticals. Mr. Winston was represented
by Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with assistance from
Suzanne Blaz.
Irvine v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-50250 (N.D. Ill. Feb.
26, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case.
Mr. Irvine was represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr.
with assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Frederick J. Daley presented a seminar with
former VE Kathryn Heatherly called, "Building a Winning
Hypothetical: Getting the Most From VE testimony," at
the Spring 2009 NADR conference held in Baltimore, MD.
For more information,
click here.
posted 3/11/2009
Spencer v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-4641 (N.D. Ill. Feb.
12, 2009).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ made his own physical RFC assessment,
splitting the difference between the State agency RFC
and Plaintiff's testimony. Ms. Spencer was
represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom with
assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
Frederick J. Daley and Marcie E. Goldbloom
presented a seminar, "Succeed at the Administrative Law
Judge Hearing" covering a variety of topics to help
others gain the skills you need to handle Social
Security Disability Cases in Oak Brook, Illinois on
February 17, 2009, and in Chicago, Illinois on February
18, 2009.
posted 2/17/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
February 2, 2009:
Court right to look at big picture in benefits case.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Mark DeBofsky and Sandra Dye were named in
the Illinois Super
Lawyers 2009.
Mr.
DeBofsky was named a Super Lawyer in Employee
Benefits/ERISA and was listed in the top 100 lawyers.
Ms. Dye was named an Illinois Rising Star in the Social
Security Disability field.
posted 2/3/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
January 19, 2009:
Ruling outlines scope of review in ERISA case.
Click on the
link to read the article.
posted 1/23/2009
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
December 29, 2008:
Ruling puts Glenn decision to work.
Click on the
link to read the article.
posted 12/30/2008
Hemminger v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-186 (W.D. Wisc. Dec.
16, 2008).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ
failed to call a vocational expert to testify regarding
the occupational impact of the requirement that
Plaintiff be allowed to change position from sitting to
standing every half an hour, and instead reached her
conclusion at Step Five based upon the
Medical-Vocational Guidelines; improperly relied on
notations that Plaintiff’s condition was stable to
discredit her treating doctor’s opinion and Plaintiff’s
testimony; erroneously misconstrues Plaintiff’s doctors’
recommendations that she do some walking against her;
inappropriately held the lack of further treatment other
than medication against Plaintiff when Plaintiff
testified that her doctor indicated there was nothing
more that could be done, inappropriately playing doctor;
failed to build a logical bridge from the evidence to
her credibility conclusions; misconstrued the Medical
Expert’s testimony regarding Plaintiff’s mental
limitations; and failed to properly consider the effect
of her combination of impairments on her ability to work.
Ms. Hemminger was represented by Frederick J. Daley,
Jr. with assistance from Suzanne Blaz. posted 12/16/2008
Sassan v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-120 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 15,
2008).
The District Court issued an order adopting the
Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation to remand
this case because the ALJ
failed to address Plaintiff’s undisputed limitations in
neck flexion and pushing and pulling and misinterpreted
treating evidence in this regard, resulting in an
erroneous RFC determination and erroneous hypotheticals
to the VE. Ms. Sassan was represented by
Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with assistance from
Marcie Goldbloom and Kate Hoppe. posted 12/16/2008
Speer-Cihlar v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-911 (N.D. Ill.
Dec. 12, 2008).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ
repeatedly failed to build a bridge from the evidence to
his conclusions, disregarding nearly all of the medical
professional opinions of record, and failed to indicate
his rationale made meaningful review impossible and
which resulted in an incomplete RFC determination and
erroneous hypotheticals. Additionally, the ALJ
ignored evidence from Plaintiff’s treating doctor and
improperly misconstrued Plaintiff’s minimal activities
against her. Ms. Speer-Cihlar was
represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with
assistance from Suzanne Blaz. posted 12/16/2008
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
December 15, 2008:
Insurer functioned as administrator: court.
Click on the
link to read the article. posted 12/16/2008
Brown v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-2052 (N.D. Ill.
Dec. 11, 2008).
The government declined to brief the case, but
instead agreed to a voluntary remand. This
occurred after the case had been briefed for district
court by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant. Ms. Brown was
represented by Frederick J. Daley with assistance
from
Kim Jones.
posted 12/16/2008
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
December 1, 2008:
Ruling an indictment of Unum's operations.
Click on the
link to read the article.
Hennessy v. Astrue, No. 07-cv-6923 (N.D. Ill. Nov.
21, 2008).
The District Court issued a remand in this case
because the ALJ:
erred in rejecting the treating doctor’s 2007 opinion
because there was no contradictory opinion and based
upon his own lay opinion, noting that an consultative
examination from 2 years prior to the opinion cannot
invalidate it; and did not provide an articulated
credibility determination, failed to consider objective
evidence supporting Plaintiff’s allegations and relied
on mere speculation. Mr. Hennessy was
represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with
assistance from
Kate Hoppe and Suzanne Blaz.
Kubiak v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-1108 (W.D. Ten.
Nov. 28, 2008).
The government declined to brief the case, but
instead agreed to a voluntary remand. This
occurred after the case had been briefed for district
court by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant. Mr. Kubiak
was represented by Marcie E. Goldbloom with
assistance from
Kate Hoppe.
Allen v. Astrue, No. 08-cv-2127 (C.D. Ill.
Nov. 19, 2008).
The government declined to brief the case, but
instead agreed to a voluntary remand. This
occurred after the case had been briefed for district
court by Daley, DeBofsky and Bryant. Ms. Allen was
represented by Frederick J. Daley, Jr. with
assistance from Suzanne Blaz.
The following article by
Mark DeBofsky appeared in the Chicago Daily Law
Bulletin's Workplace Issues section on
November 24, 2008:
An end to lenient regime of claim reviews.
Click on the
link to read the article.
posted 12/1/2008
Notice:
Neither by accessing this site or by reviewing its
contents has an attorney-client relationship been formed
or established; and nothing contained in this site shall
constitute the giving or rendering of legal advice or be
construed as a legal opinion, or guarantee of a
particular resolution of a legal problem. This
information is provided as a public service, and is not
intended to be a substitute for competent legal
counsel. The information provided is general in nature
and may not apply to your circumstances, particularly if
you are not in the State of Illinois. Under no
circumstances should you make legal decisions solely
based upon the information provided on this web site.
You should consult an attorney before making any
important decision involving a legal matter.
Copyright 2005-2006 Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant.
 |